Why Mixpanel Initially Kept Quiet After Hacked - Science Techniz

Page Nav

HIDE

Grid

GRID_STYLE

Trending News

latest

Why Mixpanel Initially Kept Quiet After Hacked

Hackers targeted a popular analytics firm Mixpanel that has been 'inadvertently' accumulating data from OpenAI. When news broke th...

Hackers targeted a popular analytics firm Mixpanel that has been 'inadvertently' accumulating data from OpenAI.
When news broke that Mixpanela, a data analytics provider that OpenAI used for web analytics on the frontend interface for API product (platform.openai.com) had suffered a security breach, a pressing question emerged: Why did it take weeks for the public to be informed? For many, silence after a hack is interpreted as negligence or an attempt to hide the truth. 

However, in the complex world of cybersecurity, this initial silence is often a critical and deliberate component of a responsible incident response strategy to deny intelligence to the hackers. The delay of Mixpanel's announcing the cyber attack that affect OpenAI including ChatGPT on November 9th and the notification to the public witheld, in fact it was not a cover-up; it was a necessary period for information containment, investigation, and preparation to the incident. Here’s a look inside the critical steps that happen during the incident response.

1. Containing the Bleed: The absolute first priority after detecting an intruder is to lock them out. Imagine a security team discovering a burglar in a specific room of a large building. You wouldn't immediately run outside to announce it to the neighborhood; you'd first secure the doors to prevent the burglar from accessing other rooms or escaping with more loot.

This is precisely what Mixpanel did. Upon identifying the compromised internal account, they initiated containment procedures, temporarily restricted access to specific data clusters, and deployed infrastructure patches. This crucial work, done swiftly and quietly, prevented the attacker from causing further damage.

2. Understanding the "What" and "How": Before a company can tell you what was stolen, it must conduct a thorough forensic investigation. A premature announcement based on incomplete information can do more harm than good. During this period, security teams are racing to answer essential questions:

  • How did the attackers get in? Was it a single vulnerability or multiple points of entry?
  • What data was actually accessed and exported? This requires sifting through immense volumes of logs to trace the attacker's steps.
  • Are the attackers still in the system? Declaring a threat eliminated before it actually is can lead to a second, more damaging breach.

In this case, Mixpanel worked to pinpoint the source of the intrusion while also preparing the specific dataset that was exported to share with customers like OpenAI. This allowed for precise and accurate notifications, rather than vague and alarming ones.

3. Denying Intel to the Attacker: Early public disclosure can inadvertently arm the attackers. If threat actors learn that their presence has been detected but their methods are not fully understood, they can alter their tactics, cover their tracks, or accelerate their attack. By managing communications carefully and addressing the vulnerability first, companies can slam the door shut before the criminals know it’s about to be locked.

4. Building a Clear Path for Customers: For a company like OpenAI, which relied on Mixpanel's services, getting fragmented information is unhelpful. The delay allowed Mixpanel to provide its customers with a complete picture: "Here is what happened, here is the data that was involved, and here is what we have done to fix it."

This approach reduces confusion and allows partners to conduct their own internal reviews, as OpenAI did, to confirm the breach was isolated and no core systems were affected. It transforms a chaotic situation into a managed process.

The information that may have been affected here could be used as part of phishing or social engineering attacks against you or your organization. Since names, email addresses, and OpenAI API metadata (e.g., user IDs)  were included, we encourage you to remain vigilant for credible-looking phishing attempts or spam. As a reminder:

  • Treat unexpected emails or messages with caution, especially if they include links or attachments.
  • Double-check that any message claiming to be from OpenAI is sent from an official OpenAI domain.
  • OpenAI does not request passwords, API keys, or verification codes through email, text, or chat.
  • Further protect your account by enabling multi-factor authentication.

The goal of a responsible disclosure process is not secrecy, but clarity. Releasing unverified or incomplete details can cause unnecessary alarm and erode trust. By taking the time to investigate, contain, and plan, companies can move from simply announcing a breach to providing a meaningful update on a resolved incident. 

Mixpanel’s phased response—first securing its systems, then notifying partners, and finally informing the public—highlights the difficult balance companies must strike in today's interconnected digital environment. While the instinct for immediate transparency is understandable, a measured and thorough approach is often what best protects users in the long run.

"Loading scientific content..."
"If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration" - Nikola Tesla
Viev My Google Scholar