In 2007, around half of all mobile phones sold were Nokia phones, Nokia 3310 and Nokia E61i was among the dominants. For anyone who lived th...
 |
| In 2007, around half of all mobile phones sold were Nokia phones, Nokia 3310 and Nokia E61i was among the dominants. |
By 2007, Nokia held over 50% of the global mobile phone market. Its operating system, Symbian, powered more smartphones than all competitors combined. And yet, in less than five years, it all came crashing down. So what happened?
The Shock of the iPhone
When Steve Jobs unveiled the iPhone in 2007, it wasn't just a new product — it was a shift in human-computer interaction. No stylus. No physical keyboard. Just a screen and a promise: everything you need, just a touch away.
More importantly, Apple introduced the App Store in 2008, which transformed the phone into a software platform. Suddenly, it wasn’t about specs — it was about *what your phone could do*. Developers flocked to iOS. Consumers followed. And Nokia? It was caught flat-footed.
Android: The Silent Tsunami
Then came Android. Google’s decision to give away a smartphone OS for free flipped the market upside down. Companies like Samsung, HTC, and LG could now offer powerful smartphones with modern software — no licensing fees, no lock-in. By 2010, Android phones began flooding the market. They weren’t always pretty, but they were cheap, open, and improving fast. Nokia, still married to Symbian, couldn’t match their pace.
Symbian was once a brilliant and classy phone framework. It had been optimized for low-power devices long before modern smartphones existed. But it was never designed for touchscreens. Its interface felt outdated by 2009, and it was notoriously difficult for developers to build for.
 |
| Market' statistics and mobile communication data. |
Hindsight is 20/20, and many argue Nokia should’ve adopted Android early. But in 2008–2010, that would have meant giving up their proprietary software, developer ecosystem, and some control over their future. It wasn’t an easy call. Additionally, Android wasn’t great in its early days. It was buggy, had limited apps, and lacked polish. Nokia, being proud and dominant, saw Android as a step backward — a competitor, not a savior.
The Microsoft Deal
In 2011, Nokia appointed former Microsoft executive Stephen Elop as CEO. Soon after, Nokia announced a strategic partnership with Microsoft to use Windows Phone as its main smartphone platform. While Windows Phone had a clean UI and some innovations, it lacked critical mass. The app ecosystem was weak.
Developers didn’t prioritize it. Consumers were confused. And most importantly, Android and iOS were already too far ahead. By 2013, the writing was on the wall. Microsoft acquired Nokia’s mobile division, and by 2016, it had shut it down entirely. Nokia’s dream of dominating smartphones had ended not with a bang, but with a quiet fade.
Beyond external threats, Nokia also suffered from internal problems: a bloated management structure, risk-averse culture, and too many parallel projects. It was a company built for the hardware-first era — and the world had moved on.
Innovators' Dilemma was in full force: the very success that made Nokia great became the anchor that held it back. After the fall, the Nokia brand was licensed to HMD Global, which now produces solid, affordable Android phones. They're decent — even nostalgic — but far from the cutting edge.
Meanwhile, the original Nokia Corporation has pivoted back to its roots in network infrastructure and telecommunications — quietly profitable, but no longer consumer-facing. Nokia didn’t fail because it made bad phones. It failed because the industry changed faster than it could. Its strengths became weaknesses. And its decisions, while understandable at the time, proved fatal in retrospect.
Still, Nokia’s legacy remains. It connected the world before the world was even thinking about being connected. And for those of us who once proudly carried a 3310 in our pockets, that legacy will never be forgotten.
